Monday, October 5, 2009

A Brief History of One-Game Playoffs

Baseball-Reference has a list of all-time tiebreaker playoff games (* = Division Tiebreaker, ** = Wild Card Tiebreaker). The National League, for some reason, used best-of-3 tiebreakers through 1962. The only one-game playoff in that period was in the AL when the Indians beat the Red Sox in 1948. But below are the 7 one-game playoffs since 1962. Tomorrow the Twins and Tigers will make it 8.

Year Lg Date Winning Team
Losing Team Score Winning Pitcher Losing Pitcher
1978* AL 10/2/1978 Yankees @ Red Sox 5-4 Guidry Torrez
1980* NL 10/6/1980 Astros @ Dodgers 7-1 Niekro Goltz
1995* AL 10/2/1995 Mariners
Angels 9-1 Johnson Langston
1998** NL 9/28/1998 Cubs
Giants 5-3 Trachsel Gardner
1999** NL 10/4/1999 Mets @ Reds 5-0 Leiter Parris
2007** NL 10/1/2007 Rockies
Padres 9-8 Ortiz Hoffman
2008* AL 9/30/2008 White Sox
Twins 1-0 Danks Blackburn

Analysis: No team in the past 30 years has won a tiebreaker playoff game and won the World Series. The only team to make it to the World Series after the one-game playoff in the past 30 years was the 2007 Colorado Rockies.

The 1978 Yankees-Red Sox game is the most famous as it featured Bucky Dent's home-run in Fenway (or the infamous Bucky f@$ing Dent, as he's known in New England). The 2007 playoff ended after Trevor Hoffman blew the save and Matt Holliday slid just past the catcher's tag (the Rockies would sweep their way through the next two rounds before getting swept by the Red Sox). Randy Johnson pitched a complete game, 3-hitter with 12 Ks in 1995 (and then went 2-0 against the Yankees in the ALDS). The Mets won the ALDS before losing the ALCS to the Braves on a Kenny Rogers walk-off walk. The 1980 Astros, the 1998 Cubs and the 2008 White Sox wouldn't make it out of the first round of the playoffs.

So since the Yankees won the 1978 World Series, the winning one-game playoff winners are a combined 4-6 in their following playoff series.

A Look at The Giants: Quarter Mark

4-0. Can't do any better at the quarter mark. The Giants beat two division opponents, won 3 straight road games, and sit atop the NFC East. There is, however, still a lot of football to be played.

Best players: Eli Manning and Steve Smith. Plaxico who? Steve Smith leads the NFL in receptions, receiving yards, receiving TDs, and receiving yards/game. That's pretty amazing. While Smith should get a ton of credit (he has caught at least one TD in 3 straight games), even more should go to Eli Manning who has been pretty great for the Giants so far this season. His game-winning drive in Dallas was one of the highlights of the first half. I'll name them co-MVPs for the first quarter.

Biggest positions: Wide Receiver and Defense. The Giants strength at wide receiver is the depth. It's not just Smith: Dominik Hixon (who has been injured recently), Mario Manningham, Hakeem Nicks, Sinorice Moss, and the tight ends have factored in a ton for the Giants. They have one rushing TD, one defensive touchdown and eight receiving TDs. Here are the NFL ranks for their defense: 2nd in overall yards/game, 1st in passing yards/game, and 4th in points/game. The only teams within 160 yards of the Giants passing numbers all have only played 3 games until this point.

Biggest concerns: Eli's heel. "The Most Famous Foot in the Tri-State Area" is swollen and sore today, as Eli goes for an MRI that could kill any of that momentum they've gained so far this season.

Biggest weakness: Rush defense. It's a little skewed because teams have run so little against them, but the Giants have the highest yards/rush attempt against them in the NFL. That's not good. Neither is the 117.3 rushing yards/game given up (18th in the NFL). Part of the problem with being so short-handed in the secondary is that in order to keep up with their passing attack, they've left themselves vulnerable to the run. Getting guys like Chris Canty, Rocky Bernard and Justin Tuck healthy and productive should help things a bit.

Biggest injury: Kenny Phillips. I'll leave Eli out of the mix until we have a diagnosis. Losing Phillips was huge. Phillips was set to become an elite safety in the NFL and maybe make the Pro Bowl. Instead, the Giants will have to scramble to fill that spot. So far the replacements have done well. But then again, the Giants haven't faced an elite passing team yet. The Saints should be a very good test.

Upcoming schedule:
  • Sunday, Oct 11 - Oakland, 1 PM
  • Sunday, Oct 18 - @New Orleans, 1 PM
  • Sunday, Oct 25 - Arizona, 8 PM
  • Sunday, Nov 1 - @Philadelphia 4 PM
  • Sunday, Nov 8 - San Diego, 4 PM
  • Bye week
My Prediction: I see a 3-2 run in there. That could all change if Eli is out. The Raiders should be a gimme win (though they should use last year's embarrassing) letdown loss at Cleveland on Monday night as extra motivation) and they should beat the Cardinals, as well. The other three are up in the air. If they win 2 out of those 3, I would consider it a huge success...but I wouldn't count on it. Games at New Orleans and at Philly scare me. San Diego should be a tough match-up as well as the battle of the Rivers vs. Manning finally plays out. If they can go into their bye week 7-2, I think that would be a good start. Matt Mosley of ESPN thinks can't see them winning less than 13 games at this point...I'll be more conservative and say they look like about an 11-13 win team right now.

Overall grade: A-. The running game (though it looked a lot better on Sunday) and run defense need to improve to make it an A and they need to really put away teams better to get to an A+ (they left Kansas City in that game yesterday WAY too long). I think A- is about where they are right now which should put them in the top 2-3 teams in the NFL at the quarter mark. Bill Simmons has them at #1, the ESPN rankings had them at #3 after last week (though, curiously, John Clayton ranked them 6th behind the Ravens, Colts, Jets, Vikings and Saints). I do believe that if they win November 1st in Philly, the G-men put themselves in the drivers seat to win the division.

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Yankee Postseason Roster

Ready, Set, Go! The Yankees finish off the regular season with a big win against the Rays and a monster game for ARod. While the Yankees haven't yet "officially" decided upon the playoff format of their choice, it appears as if they will go for the longer series, allowing them to feature only three starting pitchers.

More so than in recent Yankee playoff appearances, the Yankees have some important decisions to make regarding their postseason roster (which probably speaks to their tremendous depth). Here are the players who are a lock to make the roster:

Starting Lineup:
Derek Jeter SS
Johnny Damon LF
Mark Teixeira 1B
Alex Rodriguez 3B
Hideki Matsui DH
Jorge Posada C
Nick Swisher RF
Robinson Cano 2B
Melky Cabrera CF

Bench:
Jose Molina C
Brett Gardner OF
Jerry Hairston, Jr. INF-OF

Starting Pitchers:
Game 1 - CC Sabathia
Game 2 - AJ Burnett
Game 3 - Andy Pettitte
Game 4 (if necessary) - CC Sabathia
Game 5 (if necessary) - AJ Burnett

Bullpen:
Mariano Rivera
Phil Hughes
Alfredo Aceves
David Robertson
Phil Coke

That leaves us with five spots left. Seeing how this is a short series and the Yankees are choosing to go with three starters, I only see them taking ten pitchers on their roster. Joe Girardi will pick two of the following pitchers: Chad Gaudin, Joba Chamberalin, and Damaso Marte. Keep in mind that his decision may be affected by the outcome of Tuesday's game between the Tigers and the Twins, as the Tigers are a heavy right-handed hitting lineup. However, ultimately, I think Girardi will go with Gaudin and Chamberlain. Marte has been effective against lefties since returning from his shoulder injury but I do not think that he has done enough to earn a place on the roster. However, he could make the roster if the Yankees procede to the ALCS. Gaudin has pitched very well lately and he can pitch in both long and short relief. As for Chamberlain, his stuff is too good to disregard. What is especially interesting is the fact that the Yankees sent him out for one inning today and he looked incredibly comfortable. Could the Yankees find themselves using him as a short reliever in the first round or would they rather have him available as another long reliever? (Note - Let's not turn this into a Joba role debate, as I can assure you that should the Yankees make it to the ALCS, he will probably be the game four starter, although one has to wonder if short inning stints will hamper his ability to start a game. However, I have to admit Joba looked like a different pitcher today).

As for the rest of the roster, I see Girardi taking Freddy Guzman as a secondary pinch runner. The Yankees have been plagued in recent postseason appearances by a lack of an ability to make a lot of damage on the basepaths. Having both Guzman and Gardner will allow Girardi to run for both Hideki Matsui and Jorge Posada should the situation arise. Girardi will probably take two of the following three players to round out the roster: Eric Hinske (Corner INF/Corner OF), Ramiro Pena (INF/OF (Minors Only)), and Francisco Cervelli (C). This could be an interesting decision, as all three players could contribute. If it were my pick, I would take Hinske and Cervelli. Hinske has postseason experience and could pinch-hit for either of their pinch runners should they remain in the game. Girardi has stated that Molina may start a game during the series, which means that Posada would either be used as a DH or as a pinch hitter later in the game. The Yankees would therefore need to carry a third catcher should Molina or Posada be pinch hit/pinch run for. However, I think Girardi will take Pena instead of Hinske. Hinske contributes nothing defensively and Girardi likes Pena's athleticism. Plus, Pena has a nice, short stroke and did not embarass himself in his rookie season.

So, what are everyone else's thoughts?

A Look At The NFL Spreads: Week 4

Just took a tour of ESPN--too cool. Met some of the guys from Sunday NFL Countdown and I remembered I should post my picks (Home team in CAPS, my pick in bold, best bets in bold and italics):



FAVORITE PTS UNDERDOG
Giants 9 CHIEFS
SAINTS 6 1/2 Jets
TEXANS 9 1/2 Raiders
Titans 3 JAGUARS
PATRIOTS 2 Ravens
Bengals 5 1/2 BROWNS
BEARS 10 1/2 Lions
REDSKINS 7 Bucs
COLTS 11 Seahawks
Bills 1 1/2 DOLPHINS
49ERS 10 Rams
Cowboys 3 BRONCOS
STEELERS 6 1/2 Chargers
VIKINGS 3 1/2 Packers


What do you think? I have the Bears as my suicide pick this week so I'm hedging my bets with the Lions dog pick. I think the Titans and Bengals are not getting enough respect considering they're playing the awful Jaguars and the even more dreadful Browns and they're favored by 3 and 5.5, respectively.



Best games of the week? Vikings-Packers, Steelers-Chargers, Saints-Jets, and--my pick for the best game of the week-- Patriots-Ravens.



Let's hope the Giants don't have another slip-up this week like they had against the Browns last year. Will update later. Go G-men!

Friday, October 2, 2009

Brandeis baseball to retire Nelson Figueroa's #2

The editors of No You're a Towel -- including me -- are very ashamed. I don't know how we missed this, but inexplicably we did.

On October 10, the Brandeis University baseball team will retire Nelson Figueroa's #2 following its annual Alumni Game on campus. (If you would like to attend this event, which is catered by "Blue Ribbon BBQ" from Newton, Mass., the RSVP date is Oct. 7 and you can sign up on the above-linked website.)

In any case, this is a big moment for Brandeis baseball. Figueroa is undoubtedly the program's best product, a real major leaguer who made it to the top and hung around for a while. While he's far from a star, he has had more than a cup of coffee as a pro. In fact, he has been a legitimate member of the rotation for the Mets, Phillies, and Brewers. That's nothing to sneeze at.

So all of us at NYaT would like congratulate Mr. Figueroa on a successful career. We would also like to thank him for representing Brandeis well and with some pride (remember that polite WBRS interview he gave not too long ago?).

And while the article is vague as to whether Figueroa will actually attend the retirement of his own number, it's a good bet that he'll be there. It's not like the Mets will still be playing baseball that far into October.

Didn't Get Yankees Playoffs Tickets? There's Still a Chance

Just had a long conversation with someone from the New York Yankees ticket office. He was trying to get me to buy a plan for next season, but we ended up veering off on the topic of playoff tickets. Although a date has been set for public onsale, there will be little-to-no tickets available for that sale (all remaining tickets went to partial plan owners).

But that does not mean there are no tickets left for sale by the Yankees.

According to this employee, starting 3 hours before game time, the Yankees will sell on a first-come, first-serve basis tickets held back for public sale. These will include regular tickets throughout the stadium, but will also include standing room and new café style seating on the Field Level.

The new café style seating is right behind the wheelchair area and is bar-style seating according to the employee. These tickets (approximately 60) will be $81 per ticket for the ALDS and $131 for the ALCS. The standing room tickets (app. 200) will be $33 on the Field Level for the ALDS, $64 on the Field Level for the ALCS , $25 on the Main Level for the ALDS, and $48 on the Main Level for the ALCS.

So here are your options to see a Yankees playoff game in person this year, the first year of the New Yankee Stadium:
  1. Know someone
  2. Have had a season plan or package and gotten tickets
  3. Be one of very, very few to get one on Monday for the public on-sale
  4. Pay up the wazoo on Stubhub or another secondary market for tickets
  5. Or get to the Stadium really early on game day to stand in line and try to score tickets
The last option isn't a bad one, especially compared to the prices charged on Stubhub. Not sure how many people know about the last option and hopefully the lines will not be too long.

Good luck to everyone. I fell into category #1 and am going for ALDS game 2 on Friday night. Hope everyone else is as lucky

MLB Adopting Little League Rules For ALDS

The Boston Red Sox are a huge ratings draw for Major League Baseball and to help them out in their first round series with the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim (of California; of the United States; of North America; of the Western Hemisphere; of Earth), Major League Baseball is instituting the Little League leading rules for the American League Division Series.

As Buster Olney wrote: "No catcher has allowed more stolen bases this season than [Jason] Varitek, who has surrendered a whopping 114 while throwing out just 15, but [Victor] Martinez has thrown out just 9 of 63 would-be base-stealers."

Major League Baseball was worried about a quick exit in the first round for the Red Sox so they decided to change the rules this year to give them the advantage. There is precedent for this: in 2004, they instructed the umpire in Game 4 of the ALCS to call Dave Roberts safe at second in the bottom of the 9th (when he was definitely out) so that the Red Sox would not be swept and create a ratings nightmare.

The Angels will not be allowed to lead in the ALDS. They must wait with a foot touching the base until the pitcher has released the ball. Only then may they take a three step lead. Any deviance from this will result in an automatic out.

The suggestion to do this came from George Mitchell, who Major League Baseball deems an impartial judge...even though he his gainfully employed by the Red Sox.

Angels' manager Mike Scioscia is not happy about the development but knows the drill: "We lost to the Red Sox in the first round of 2004, 2007 and 2008. They let us win a grand total of one game in those three series. So I'll just say, yeah, MLB seems to have it out for us."

Scioscia has been fined $750,000 for his comments and is prohibited from Chone Figgins in the first two games of the series.

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Robinson Cano: The Next Carlos Baerga or the Next Yogi Berra?

According to Baseball-Reference, only Mickey Mantle, Joe DiMaggio, Ben Chapman, Derek Jeter, Don Mattingly, and Lou Gerhig have more hits at age 26 than Robinson Cano and only DiMaggio and Gerhig had more doubles (also according to B-R). Cano came out of no place to have a great start to his career. So where does Cano go from here? Baseball-Reference lists the most similar players and I found it interesting to see Carlos Baerga and Yogi Berra's name both on there.

Through age 26, Carlos Baerga was a rising star in baseball. He had been named to three All Star Games, had four .300 seasons in a row, and posted two 100-RBI seasons. Then, in 1996, he struggled in the first half, was traded to the Mets, and was never a productive player again. Baerga's biggest problem? Lack of patience at the plate. He walked over 35 times once in his career and that was at age 22.

Yogi Berra was a very good hitter in his first few seasons but in his fourth season, at age 25, he took a huge leap thanks to a .388 OBP and never looked back. Yogi would never be a big walk guy (his highest total was 65), but he continued to develop as a hitter while Baerga seemed to regress.

Let's look at the stat comparison of Cano, Baerga, and Berra and add in Joe Mauer and Derek Jeter to the mix:

Stats through age 25
Player         From  To Yrs   G    AB    R    H   2B  3B  HR  RBI  BB   SO    BA   OBP   SLG   OPS+
+--------------+---------+--+----+-----+----+----+---+---+---+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+----+
Robinson Cano 2005-2008 4 573 2218 303 671 151 15 62 309 99 272 .303 .335 .468 109
Joe Mauer 2004-2008 5 561 2059 325 653 128 14 44 301 292 233 .317 .399 .457 128
Carlos Baerga 1990-1994 5 684 2628 404 796 137 13 78 415 143 320 .303 .342 .454 116
Yogi Berra 1946-1950 5 482 1796 289 540 90 21 75 371 116 74 .301 .347 .499 123
Derek Jeter 1995-1999 5 638 2537 486 807 122 31 63 341 273 473 .318 .389 .465 121
The averages are all around the same, but Derek Jeter and Joe Mauer lead in OBP while Cano and Berra lead in slugging. I took out stolen bases because Jeter's the only one here who really relies on speed. But when you put them together, they all have their plusses and minuses. To be fair, age 25 was a down year for Robby. So let's see how they bounced back.

Stats through age 26
Player         From  To Yrs   G    AB    R    H   2B  3B  HR  RBI  BB   SO    BA   OBP   SLG   OPS+
+--------------+---------+--+----+-----+----+----+---+---+---+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+----+
Robinson Cano 2005-2009 5 731 2846 406 873 199 17 87 394 129 334 .307 .339 .480 113
Joe Mauer 2004-2009 6 694 2564 414 838 157 15 72 394 361 293 .327 .407 .484 138
Carlos Baerga 1990-1995 6 819 3185 491 971 165 15 93 505 178 351 .305 .345 .454 115
Yogi Berra 1946-1951 6 623 2343 381 701 109 25 102 459 160 94 .299 .348 .498 125
Derek Jeter 1995-2000 6 786 3130 605 1008 153 35 78 414 341 572 .322 .394 .468 122

So this includes the year that Mauer and Cano are now finishing up. As you can see, Mauer is definitely better than Cano and so is Jeter (though Cano had more power), but Berra and Baerga are right there. Let's see what happened the next year for those bottom 3.

Stats through age 27 (with the exception of Mauer and Cano who are not yet 27)
Player         From  To Yrs   G    AB    R    H   2B  3B  HR  RBI  BB   SO    BA   OBP   SLG   OPS+
+--------------+---------+--+----+-----+----+----+---+---+---+----+----+----+-----+-----+-----+
Robinson Cano  2005-2009  5  731  2846  406  873 199  17  87  394  129  334  .307  .339  .480  113
Joe Mauer 2004-2009 6 694 2564 414 838 157 15 72 394 361 293 .327 .407 .484 138
Carlos Baerga 1990-1996 7 945 3692 550 1100 193 15 105 571 199 378 .298 .338 .444 108
Yogi Berra 1946-1952 7 765 2877 478 847 126 26 132 557 226 118 .294 .350 .494 127
Derek Jeter 1995-2001 7 936 3744 715 1199 188 38 99 488 397 671 .320 .392 .470 122
And this is where you can separate the men from the boys. Can Cano take that next step next year? This year he's cut down on the strikeouts and some of the poor decision-making at the plate, but his walks have no risen. Part of that is due to hitting in such a potent lineup, but his anxiety and failures with runners in scoring position has done nothing to help that out.

Still, he had his first 200-hit season this year and looks much more comfortable at the plate (and in the field as well). With no one on base, his slashes of .379/.410/.615 are very good. Also good for Robby, he's improved his ratios a lot: his HR%, XBH%, X/H%, AB/SO, LD%, and HR/FB have all gone up and his SO%, SO/BB, AB/HR, and GB/FB have all gone down. Even his BB% is higher than last year, albeit less than his high in 2007.

The key will be to continue on this positive path with much better walk rates and with better numbers with RISP (and if he's motivated, it seems Cano can continue to improve). If Cano can take that next step, he may still not be Yogi Berra (or Joe Mauer or Derek Jeter), and we may not be talking about him as a great all-time Yankee...but at least he won't become the Next Carlos Baerga.

Joba vs. Hughes: Who is a Better Reliever?

As we come to the end of the year, I think it's finally time to look back at the set-up terms of Joba Chamberlain and Phil Hughes to see who performed better:

Joba Chamberlain: 3-2, 1 save, 1.53 ERA, 49 games, 59 innings, 39 hits (11 XBH), 2 HR, 20 BB, 78 K, 1.000 WHIP, 11.9 K/9, 3.90 SO/BB, .185/.259/.261 slashes against

Phil Hughes: 5-1, 3 saves, 1.24 ERA, 42 games, 50.2 innings, 28 hits (4 XBH), 2 HR, 13 BB, 64 K, 0.809 WHIP, 11.4 K/9, 4.92 SO/BB, .160/.218/.211 slashes against

I know it's a small sample size, but I think that Phil Hughes has been an even better reliever than Joba (as amazing as that is for some people to believe). And if you take their ALDS performance in 2007 when both pitched out of the bullpen, Hughes climbs even more.

More on Joba:
  • Jack Curry compares the Joba Rules to Justin [Verlander] Rules. The big difference? Verlander was 26 and already had built up the innings. Joba is 24 and is still building up arm strength.
  • Rob Neyer writes that Joba sealed his ALDS fate with last night's start. Though I have to disagree with Rob that Joba shouldn't pitch in the series. Can he not be a help for the bullpen with the numbers he's put up in the past two years working out of there?
  • Before Joba's start against the Red Sox, Sweeny Murti asked if the Yankees had ruined Joba. I agree with Sweeny when he says that Joba's 24; let's see what happens with him. Look at Zack Grienke's career path before you declare Joba "ruined".
  • After watching him pitch well against the Red Sox, Sam Borden wrote that Joba responded to a stern approach. I believe this is how the Yankees should have treated Joba all along. The Yanks got into trouble handing spots to Joba, Hughes and Ian Kennedy last season. They need to be a little less nuturing and a little more firm.
  • Within this piece, Peter Gammons says that Joba is important to the Yankees run in the postseason because he could make two Game 4 starts.
More on Hughes:
  • Bob Klapisch tells you how Phil Hughes has become the 8th inning wonder: Mariano Rivera's cutter. This can only help Hughes as he transitions back to starter next season as Hughes' biggest problem seemed to be the lack of a third pitch.
  • IIATMS breaks down "The Amazing Phil Hughes" even further. I have to admit that some of that goes way over my head, but it's really interesting the amount of statistical analysis there is out there.
  • New York Magazine does a Yankee playoff preview of Phil Hughes and correctly points out he's the last man to win a playoff game for the Yankees (image from that article). There is one place I have to argue with NYMag about: "If a closer is critical to postseason success, then it stands to reason that the man responsible for getting him the ball is pretty important, too." Yes, that man is called your STARTING PITCHER!
I know this will drive certain people wild (I can think of a certain WFAN radio host...), but Phil Hughes and Joba Chamberlain will most probably both be starters next season. Let's just hope that Hughes can carry over the success of his relief stint better than Joba has recently. They're both really young and their success as dominant relievers should excite you for their future as (hopefully) dominant starters.

What Is Your Biggest Fear For The Yankees Going Into the Playoffs?

What is your biggest area of concern for the Yankees going into October? CC's lack of playoff success? AJ's up and down season? Andy's arm? Joba's big question mark? Running out of gas? Possibly facing a good pitching team in the Tigers? A-rod and his October demons? A possible Red Sox or Angels match-up in round 2 (and having to go to those two parks where the Yanks have had trouble)? Looking ahead to the second round and getting pounced on in round 1? A key injury? A guy like Brian Bruney or Phil Coke imploding in a big spot? Jorge Posada catching every game? Etc...

The Wall Street Journal thinks they may have clinched too early. Hopefully it won't be the Sports Illustrated Cover curse. I posed that above question to a few friends and was curious what their response would be. So I e-mailed them and let the e-mail chain roll for a day. Here's what I got:

Andrew: For me, the biggest fear, as Joel Sherman alludes to, is home run reliance. This team has hit a tremendous amount of home runs and have hit them up and down the lineup, especially at home. But what happens if the wind is blowing in in October or they face hot pitching or they go on the road to a park like Detroit where you can't as easily hit it out? Will they be able to adjust and win with small ball? I don't mean bunting (Joe Girardi has shown an annoying tendency to bunt with good hitters and I, personally, HATE it), but hit and runs or getting the guy in from third with less than two outs.

A guy like Robinson Cano is the perfect example: will he press too much to hit one out at home that he won't do what it takes to get the job done and continue his awful regular season RISP hitting? The fear I have is that they go into these playoffs as they went in the last time they faced the Tigers in 2006: a tremendous offensive lineup that couldn't adjust to October baseball.

Ben: I have to agree with Andrew. As with most of the recent Yankee playoff failures, I fear that this team's regular season success and ability to dominate their opponents will fail to translate into postseason success.

One of the great things about the Yankee dynasty is that whenever they were down and seemed out, they never pressed, which is why they were so successful. We don't know how well this Yankee team will respond to the pressures of being down in a series or facing a possible elimination game.

However, for the first time, I believe Alex Rodriguez's lack of postseason success in recent years has become one of the less worrisome concerns.

Jay: Not to be off topic but Chuck Knoblauch...wow. I had to pass that along.

Glenn: For me, it comes down to the starting pitching. I'm not worried about CC and Peter Gammons had a great article on ESPN.com yesterday on why we shouldn't look this his past postseason history as a guide for what will happen this time around. I'm also not worried about Andy because even when he doesn't have his best stuff, you can always count on him to give you everything he does have and sometimes, that's good enough.

The biggest question mark is Burnett. With him, it feels like you have to flip a coin every night and see what side it lands on. I'm encouraged by his last few starts, but he put together a string of great starts in the middle of the summer and then suddenly forgot to pitch again. I'm hoping that's not the case this time around.

Paul: Everything is well said so not much more to add. Just a couple things:

1) It's tough being a Yankee fan sometimes because it’s all or nothing so of course everyone has worries because it’s simply difficult to go all the way

2) I agree that pitching is the key, the hitting should be fine. One thing not to underestimate is that it seems like the culture of the team has changed (for the better). All the pie celebrations, etc.. shouldn’t go overlooked. This team seems like they are having fun and pick each other up so I’m happy about that.

Dad: One big problem I could see is the outfield defense. Damon is awful out in left and Swisher is an adventure out in rightfield. Teams may also try to take advantage of their arms are take the extra base. That could prove pivotal in the playoffs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So there you have it. It looks like it will be the Tigers in the first round. What's your biggest fear for the Yankees?