Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Sorting out the American League MVP Race

20 years ago it was easy to pick an MVP. You figured out who had the best combination of batting average, home runs, and RBIs on a team that competed for the playoffs and you give it to him. Now, with the advent of multiple advanced metrics, the choices actually become tougher. What do you value the most? wOBA, runs created, WPA, WAR? And if you choose WAR (Wins Above Replacement), which WAR do you pick—FanGraphs WAR (fWAR) or Baseball-Reference WAR (bWAR)? Or something else all together? Well let’s take a look at the American League MVP field as we reach the end of August to see my top candidates. I’ll give my order at the end, so you’ll have to read through to find out who my top 10 are:  
Jose Bautista is the best hitter in the AL--but is he the MVP (CBC)

Jose Bautista: This one is the toughest for most people to comprehend (including me, at first). Bautista leads the American League in bWAR and fWAR. He is tied for the Major League lead in home runs (38) and is first in OBP (.453), SLG (.645), runs created (130), walks (107), and wOBA (.457). And before you go and say that a guy can’t be an MVP for a team that has no chance of going to the playoffs, think about this: the Blue Jays right now are a .500 team and how much worse would they be if they didn’t have Bautista? And if the Blue Jays played in any other division, they may be looking towards the playoffs with Bautista running away with the award. Oh, and he’s the best player in baseball in 2011.

Justin Verlander: Like Bautista, Verlander suffers from another old-school idea that pitchers can’t be MVPs. Usually I agree, but Verlander may be an exception to the rule. He leads the league in wins (20), W/L (.800), starts (29), IP (215.2), K (218), WHIP (0.904), H/9 (6.1), and has a sparkling ERA (2.38), FIP (2.84) and xFIP (3.03). He leads all pitchers in both bWAR and fWAR and is fifth in fWAR and second in bWAR. And where would the Tigers be without Verlander? The Yankees pitching after CC Sabathia is not great but the same is true of the Tigers who don’t have the same peripheral team as Verlander has this season.

Curtis Granderson: As a Yankee fan, the Grandy Man is a tough candidate to root against. Last year he was a frustrating player to have on your team as he not only struggled mightily against lefties, but you felt like he should be a better player overall. Well a trip to the swing doctor, Kevin Long, during a particularly bad stretch last August has turned him around and the results cannot be better. He already has 38 home runs (tied for first), 122 runs (top by far), and 107 RBI (most despite hitting 2nd quite a bit this season) tops his counting stats and with 24 stolen bases, he has a great chance of having a 30-30 season. His batting average (.276) and strikeout rate (24.1%) are not pretty for most but the one thing that would stop Granderson from winning the award may be his poor defense this year by most advanced metrics (as a Yankee fan, I can back that up at times as his terrible jumps and routes to the ball, combined with his poor arm make him tough to watch at times out there). But nothing he does surprises A-Rod anymore.

Jacoby Ellsbury: Alex Speier from WEEI says that Granderson and Ellsbury are among the new guard of top players who are well-rounded, doing a bit of everything right. Ellsbury is second in the AL in fWAR and 4th in bWAR (3rd among position players) and looks like a totally different player. The biggest issue is that I’m not sure how you can pick him as the best player—even on his own team. While he does a lot of things well, he’s not tops in any stat category except for triples, though he really is the leadoff hitter the Red Sox lineup needs to get them going.

Dustin Pedroia: You look at him and continue to wonder how he does it and after already winning an MVP award, he’s certainly a candidate for another. And while he’s 3rd in bWAR (2nd among position players) and fWAR, he suffers from the fact he plays with Ellsbury and Adrian Gonzalez (and the forgotten Kevin Youkilis), who each do what Pedroia does—but most of them do it better in some ways. Few in baseball are better defensively than Pedroia at their position, though, and it certainly elevates the diminutive Pedroia.

Adrian Gonzalez: He may have been the MVP at the All-Star Break, but he’s fallen off and given way to those who set the table for him in the lineup. He should win the batting title however, which is pretty impressive in his first year in the American League. I won’t count him out of winning the award, however, as his counting stats, his first-base defense and his first-place team may put him near the front of the pack. More likely, however, is that his teammates all split votes and A-Gone is left out.

Ben Zobrist: Zobrist isn’t going to win the MVP and probably won’t get a lot of votes, but he’s a candidate once again and his value can definitely be seen this year as he’s been the most consistent player on a gritty, but undermanned Rays team. 5th in fWAR, 9th among position players in bWAR, and really one of the most underrated players in the league as he plays whatever position the Rays need him to—and Zorilla plays it well.

Jered Weaver and CC Sabathia: A few weeks back when the bad blood occurred between the Angels and Tigers, the matchup on the mound was Weaver vs. Verlander in a matchup of two teams fighting for playoff spots and two pitchers fighting for the Cy Young. Verlander not only dominated that game, he came close to throwing another no hitter, again putting his team on his back. Weaver is a great pitcher, but he ended up getting hit, lost his temper, and left a game when his team needed his dominance on the mound. Sabathia may be in contention if he didn’t have to face the Red Sox, but the hefty lefty is right now running behind Verlander in the Cy Young race and behind a few of his teammates in the MVP race.

Brett Gardner, Robinson Cano and Nick Swisher: After Granderson and Sabathia, who would you pick as the Yankees 2011 MVP? It’s not Mark Teixeira (despite his power numbers) or Derek Jeter (despite his second-half turnaround) or Mariano Rivera (despite being one of the best closers in baseball again) or David Robertson (who is probably the best set-up man in baseball at this point): it’s one of these three. Gardner is rated as the best defensive player by both FanGraphs and B-R and he is a game-changer with his league-leading 38 stolen bases (though he has slowed down lately at the plate). Would you believe that FanGraphs has Nick Swisher rated as the 4th best and B-R as the 2nd best defenders in the AL? His second-half turnaround is overshadowed by Jeter’s but he’s on his way to another quietly-great season—and to getting his $10.25 million option for next year a sure bet to be picked up. Cano has been nowhere where he was last year (or during his Homerun Derby), but he’s been pretty damn good for the Yankees, producing with the bat and with the glove like few in the Majors can—when he’s focused and on.

Michael Young and Ian Kinsler: Do you think the Rangers are glad that they didn’t trade Michael Young? Young doesn’t have nearly as much value as Kinsler does but he has been invaluable, shifting all around the diamond as the Rangers have dealt with injuries all season. I always underrate Kinsler but it’s time to give him his due as he’s had another solid season of 20 HR, 20 SB, and very good defense at second base. Neither one will get much MVP pub (and rightfully so), but both have been pretty important for a Rangers squad fighting for a playoff spot. Miguel Cabrera: Another solid season for Miggy but nowhere near the MVP this year. He’s quietly put up very nice numbers again for the Tigers, however.

Alex Gordon, Jhonny Peralta, Alex Avila, Howie Kendrick, Yunel Escobar, and Alexei Ramirez: The unsung heroes of the American League here as all have put up better-than-expected numbers in 2011. None of them, though, can compete with Gordon who many thought was a Major League bust and quietly has been the Royals best player all season long as the weight of his expectations have slowly died down. He’s 6th in both bWAR and fWAR and has really quietly entered himself into the Ben Zobrist category of versatile/valuable players that a winning team needs to have. It’s an odd piece to build a team around, but after years of losing ballclubs, it’s at least something in Kansas City.

So who are my Top 10?
1. Bautista
2. Verlander
3. Granderson
4. Ellsbury
5. Pedroia
6. Zobrist
7. A-Gone
8. Gordon
9. Gardner
10. Cano

Who are your top 10? Read ESPN's Keith Law's top candidates and let us know in the comments below.

7 comments:

  1. I do not believe that Pitchers should be voted MVP---- the small exception could be a reliever --- Ie: Eck or Willie Hernandez many moons ago--- but I still do not like it.
    1) Granderson incredible transformation. I believe he is leading MLB in HR's vs. lefties.... which is amazing since that (and k's) were his acchilles heal coming over from Detoilet. I admit I was way wrong about Curtis when I questioned the move last year--- siteing the potential of Austin K. Jackson.
    2) Bautista
    3) Miguel Cabrera
    4,5,6)Gonzalez, Ellsbury, Pedroia
    7)Michael Young
    8)Cano
    9)Papi
    10)Asdrubal Cabrera (Y Not)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't buy the whole pitchers-can't-be-MVP argument. Sure, pitchers have their own award...everyone knows the Cy Young goes to the league's best pitcher. But who says the league's best pitcher can't also be the league's most valuable player?

    No disrespect to the other qualified guys (Jose Bautista tops that list, easily) but I believe that Justin Verlander has been both the best pitcher and the most valuable player in the AL. Consider this fact: in the games Verlander started, Detroit is 21-8. In the games all other pitchers started, the Tigers are 52-52. (H/T Buster Olney) Without this guy, there is no way Detroit has a 5-game lead in the AL Central. It's impossible. They're a .500 team without him.

    When you also consider that Verlander is currently leading the league in innings pitched, strikeouts, wins, and quality starts, it's clear that he is the ultimate ace: overpowering, consistent, and extremely durable. His no-hitter in April was the cherry on top.

    Bottom line: Verlander is the exception to the rule that pitchers shouldn't win MVP.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting list, Alex. I am sort of debating whether I should have left Miguel Cabrera off my list (and should have mentioned Asdrubel Cabrera though his production has fallen off recently). Another Cabrera (Melky), is also having a fine season in KC and may have been an omission (to at least discuss).

    So why should starters not be MVP but relievers could?

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is from Tom Verducci over at SI:

    Justin Verlander is the most exciting pitcher in the AL right now and the frontrunner for the AL Cy Young Award, but let's calm down on the MVP talk. The Tigers have played 130 games, only 20 of which are wins when Verlander starts. (One of the few instructions with an MVP ballot is to consider "games played.") And his team's record when Verlander gets the ball (20-8) isn't all that different than those of CC Sabathia (19-9), Josh Beckett (18-7) and Jered Weaver (18-9)

    Bottom line is that Verlander does zero for the team in the games he does not start. So during those games he is in a tie with the other Tigers sitting on the bench as the least valuable player on the team (I guess a guy stinking it up is less valuable then a guy riding pine--- but you catch my drift). I think it is imperative that the actual instructions on the ballot ask the voter to consider games played. I admit i did not know this before today but i think is very logical.

    It is something that is up for debate obviously, but I think a reliever can be MVP in extremely rare cases since he plays in so many games and the fact that he plays ioften a big role in the climax of games.

    This year I really believe granderson is the MVP but he will probably lose because of the anti-Yankees bias in the sportswriter population.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think the argument that a pitcher can't be MVP is nonsense. How can you fault a player because he only plays in 30-35 games a year? In the case of Detroit, Verlander's starts are the reason why they are in contention.

    MVP is Most Valuable Player - NOT most valuable position player. Value is subjective and can be applied any way that a voter wishes (In my opinion, Pedro should have won the MVP in 1999).

    In all fairness, perhaps it's time for MLB to establish a dedicated award for position players. I know that they tried to do that with the Hank Aaron award that but it didn't quite pan out.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think it's fairly simple, the MVP means the most valuable postiton player. That's right, no pitcher should win the award ever. This is why they have a CY Young award, the most valuable pitcher so Verlander can take that award easily.

    The MVP is most valuable, not the best statistical player, otherwise it would be called the MOP (Most Oustanding player like the Final Four). This leaves Batista out. It comes down to 2 players, one i'm shocked Andrew left off the list. Jacoby Ellsbury vs Grandeo.

    Ellsbury is having an unbelievably balanced season, perhaps one of the best ever and no one seems to notice. This might be because he is on one of the best offenses in the game so it hurts his chances of winning. For now I would take Grandeo, since he is the most valuable to his team. With A-rod doing basically nothing this year, Tex having a low on base, etc.., and doing it all from the 2 hole, it looks like he deserves it. the Avg and OBP is low to win, but it is a special season. Still, there is a month left and Jacoby is meant so much to sox (more than people realize with Crawford being so bad), I might change my mind.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Note - sorry Andrew, i see the all the names now. Still, I have the same opionion as it coming down to those 2 players

    ReplyDelete